 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Klaus J. Zupan 2008 - December |
|
|
|
|
||||
 |
 |
 |
|||||
 |
|||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||
|
Prologue extraordinary issues of science und research “Search the truth, it is simple and clear“ “Ask your heart, your mind and your friend“ “ Hear the critical voices, trust not to the majority”
52 Articles on topics for sleepless nights 37 to medicine & naturopathy 15 to evolution - added - intelligent design
 
These videos are freely available and are among the most widely viewed around the world. http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=530806696524042736&q=zeitgeist&ei=auNlSK7tGIaG2wKa6IlY http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=5355374476580235299&q=aaron%20russo%20videos%20free&hl=de http://americancreation.blogspot.com/2008/06/masonic-symbolism-in-dollar-bill.html http://www.freemasonrywatch.org/onedollarbill.html http://www.whodiedmysteries.com/Metaphysics/symbolism/10103.htm
Medicine is now commercialized and part of the global economy - and political system. The goal: control & money. The ruler of this system are few individuals and families. Long time there were many more secrets. Now, much of the Internet revealed. Something to talk about it or write is still not safe. Who dares, it should think of the following: “Who says the truth - should always have a horse with saddle at the door.” Spanish saying
“In the ears of an unreasonable does not talk, because he will despise your sensible words.“ Bible - Sayings Salomos 23:9 The author is aware what Sokrates say : “ I know that I know nothing “ A. 37 Topics of medicine & naturopathy 1. Why is naturopathy not popular ? 2. Age and illness - what effect healing ? 3. Medicine - History I - III 4. Medicine 21st Century 5. Hippokrates oath - Genevan vow 6. Dr. Hackethal - his oath 7. Medicine of the cultural people 8. Medicine of the Sumerians 9. Medicine of the british India 10 . Medicine of the Saracen - Arab Avicenna 11. Medicine of the american Indians 12. The Cheerokee Sequoyah 13. Medicine today 14. Calorie lie - weight ex - Prof. Dr. Schatalova 15. Right food 16. Dr. Wallach: which is why doctors die earlier 17. Why Illnes / Cancer / Heart increase and not from 18. Risk woman / man 19. Risk cardiac infarction 20. Plant live 21. 100 years and healthy 22. Miracle brain 23. Brain Death 24. Miracle water 25. Miracle cell 26. Perpetuum mobile 27. Authorities the physical welfare customer 28. The most important bacteria 29. Risk incidence 30. Ayuveda 31. Electro medicine: Dr. Rife - Dr. Beck - Dr. Reif 32. Acupuncture 33. Homeopathy 34. Dr. Schuessler salts 35. Dr. Bach - flowers 36. Conclusion 37. Books B. 15 topics of evolution - creation - intelligent design 1. When and why naturopathy or orthodox medicine 2. Evolution or creation 3. History of the evolution 4. Dr. Darwin 5. Materialism - definition 6. USA 60% against evolution 7. Intelligent design 8. Dr. Loennig 9. Prof. Dr. Einstein 10. Prof. Dr. Max Planck 11. Nobel Prize winner per creation 12. Scientist per creation 13. Platon 14. Elements - Peridiodensystem 15. Islam and evolution A1. Why the lack of acceptance towards naturopathy Naturopathy encompasses more than 100 different forms of therapy, often over thousands of years of experience. Many of these therapies were in the Western world long unknown. Secret knowledge was in ancient cultures strangers hidden. From the 18th Century, new forms of therapy. From 20 Century were lost as current knowledge on medicine rediscovered. Research and medicine - techniques helped the interior of the organisms to learn, and to make the complicated mechanical, chemical and electronic transactions to better understand .. The successes of naturopathy is nonsense to deny. Their effect ways to explain scientifically, is often difficult. Some therapies seem to contradict scientific principles. Not all therapies help sustainable. There are charlatans and inexperienced therapists, but it is also in orthodox medicine. Acupuncture - Homeopathy - Phytotherapy - Bach flowers - Schuessler salts Some old therapies:
There is the public via the Internet accessible, comprehensive information facilities - access to dissertations - scientific studies - university servers - literature - blind - double-blind - studies, the overwhelming arguments per naturopathy. One has only to take the time to address this knowledge and also advised to consider critical to grips with it and sometimes the devil's advocate to play. Naturopathy therapies do not need Esotherik astrology, religious or mystical shaped bases to be successful Spagyrig example, products whose impact on preparation and plants are used, by special procedures, subject to certain conditions astronomical - the sun - the moon - day-season - were prepared. No more and no less. The preparations have been used for years by the author, is not a supporter of the Esotherik is successful in humans and animals. The cause lies in the basic life of the patient and therapist to about evolution or creation. The majority of them believes that the visible universe and life forms through the development = Evolution - mutation, and not by planning, creative personality emerged. Why is essential for success or failure of therapy is here. First, we clarify various terms Evolution - mutations - the impact of mutations - Glossary of molecular - Genetics Naturopathy need neither astrological, religious nor mystic bases to be successful. An example are spagyrische products whose effect are based on preparation and used plants which were processed by special procedures, considering certain astronomical conditions - the sun - moon - day, Ta season- . No more and no less. The preparations are used for many years by the author successfully with horses and people, although the author is an opponent of the esotericism. B 1. Why and when fail naturopathy or medicine? The cause lies in the basic life setting of the therapist to the patient and on the subject: Evolution or creation. The majority among them represents the opinion that the visible universe and the life forms originated from an accidental development = evolution, by an anonymous nature and not by a planning, creative personality. Why is decisively for success or failure of a therapy, it is treated here. If we clear first different concepts. Evolution - from lat. evolvere = develop. http://re ferateguru.heim.at/Biologie.htm Mutations http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutation B 9. How many people believed in 2006 in the evolution USA 40% - Germany 70%
B 3. The theory of evolution has many fathers, long before Darwin Nevertheless, it became only in the 19th century worldwide popularly, as a legitimization for the not more braking backlash against the alone claim of the Christian churches, creation theory and with it against God. By this theory a personal creator - God became needlessly, with the result that ascribed directives, as they were announced by the different-best-behaved religions as laws and orders, the basis were taken away from him. ATHEISM as a world view became popular and herewith had found his scientific grounds. There was him though already much earlier in all societies, but only now he could gain in the modern civilisation properly a foothold. The theoretical bases for the birth of the MATERIALISM of the COMMUNISM of the NATIONAL SOCIALISM of the ANARCHY were born and a corollary of the theory of evolution. B 12. What means: materialism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_materialism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialectical_materialism MATERIALISM calls three different positions from what here in the connection the first form of importance is: the EPISTEMOLOGICAL or materialism ONTOLOGISCHE. He sees the whole reality monistisch, on one single basic principle, built up: the matter. The materialism assumes from the fact that all processes and phenomena of the world, e.g., also thoughts and ideas, manifestations of the matter are or can be led back on those . He explains the person who allow to verify him surrounding world and in her running off processes without spiritual or immaterial elements - as for example God - whose existence to itself with the methodology of the natural sciences in particular to the experiment, do not check - or falsify. B 4. Charles Darwin 1809 - 1882 Representation of the evolution - lines DNA Evolution says, that living beings originated according DNA from mutations changes him, develop constantly, and have arrived in a certain stage of development. They would be in the constant fight against other life forms such as bacteria, bacilli, microbes, mushrooms, worms, viruses. Scientists, here particularly the doctors found with it her authorisation to research to improve life forms and with non-function = illness, to intervene accordingly. Programmes heavy to milliard are put on to develop newer and newer methods and drugs. By the refusal of a creator one felt in addition entitled and obliged, with all living beings which are chance products to experiment. One does not use, e.g., any more fully functioning life forms - person or animal - as a spare parts store = organ grafts. To the test of new drugs one uses people - volunteers against payment - prisoners - soldiers or patients without their knowledge - and defenceless animals. Where from came first "a little bit"? Old horse 30 cm - to C14 - 50,000,000 years old - how a horse today!???
The impression is conveyed by the media that the theory of evolution is indisputable worldwide among scientists. This is not the case. In increasing measure and not only in the USA, announce themselves critical voices. A concept appears to the topic over and over again: Intelligently design. He stands for:However, CREATION, does not mean unambiguously: by a PERSONAL CREATOR. Many leading scientists and also the author do not divide this understanding. For them a PERSONAL CREATOR has created after plan, in a production process, perfect and completely ready KINDS of plant animals - people by a unique CREATION ACT generated. Intelligently design with Prof. Dr. Einstein and Prof. Dr. Planck Planck as well as Einstein represent the intelligent origin of the universe, namely after Einstein by an 'infinite spiritual being of higher nature', by 'to the human endlessly the best mind' etc. or with Plancks to words by a 'deliberate intelligent mind', and by 'one in wisdom to us sky-high much better being', as well as by the 'ideal mind', i.e. to Planck by “ God “. A competent voice on the subject is, in the inhabitanz of “Max-Planck-Institut” active biologists and geneticist B 8. Dr. Wolff - Ekkehard Loennig
His book on the subject http://www.weloennig.de/Gesetz_Rekurrente_Variation.html Scientific publications http://www.weloennig.de/literatur1a.html Citations on the subject http://www.weloennig.de/MaxPlanck.html Open questions appealed http://www.weloennig.de/O ffeneFragenEvol.html One of his very well investigated articles “Nobel Prize Laureate per Intelligently design" Extract from his PDF - file “To avoid possible misunderstandings, would be marked that it concerns with none of the following cited Nobel Prize Laureates"Kreationisten"sensustricto. Of my knowledge none of these researchers thinks that the universe, the earth and the life were created on it in 6 literal hourly days 24 and were maximum 10,000 years old etc. However, most accept the Big anxious model in combination with the teleological Anthropischen principle (divine flat - Eccles,"supernatural" flat - Penzias) with the milliards belonging in addition years. Even if the general theory of evolution is accepted in several cases, the today's models are rejected, nevertheless, often to the origin of the life and the synthetic theory of evolution as insufficient. From the possibilities and borders of the scientific ID theory, hence, still untouched, several of the Nobel Prize Laureates cited below still go out this, while they identify the designer unmistakably with God and speak of "religiousimpulse" and similar. The title is in view of the modern ID theory quite often an understatement, nevertheless, becomes of the etymology of the concepts Intelligently a design to which we limit ourselves here, in the teleological basic question fair. .By scientific Nobel Prize Laureates it is supposed very often that they are without exception atheists (at best still Pantheisten), basically the view of an intelligent origin of the universe and the life as "absolutely unscientific", "behind" and"kreationistisch" decline würden*. Would the in the following performed scientific Nobel Prize Laureates all"Kreationisten" for the question after the intelligent origin of the universe as well as for the direct or (from the intelligent constitution of the matter following) not be, nevertheless, from this view an indirect creation of the life? To avoid possible misunderstandings, nevertheless, I should mark already beforehand that it concerns with none of the following cited Nobel Prize Laureates "Kreationisten"sensustricto. Of my knowledge none of these researchers thinks that the universe, the earth and the life were created on it in 6 literal hourly days 24 and were maximum 10,000 years old etc. However, most accept the Big anxious model in combination with the teleological Anthropischen principle (divine flat - Eccles,"supernatural" flat - Penzias) with the milliards belonging in addition years. Even if the general theory of evolution is accepted in several cases, the today's models are rejected, nevertheless, often to the origin of the life and the synthetic theory of evolution as insufficient. My concentration on the scientific Nobel Prize Laureates affects the fact in no manner that there are hundreds of other excellent scientists whom one could also cite in this sense. The reader interested in it finds in the tape of Henry Margenau and Roy Abraham Varghese in addition many examples.” (In 1992/1994): Cosmos, biology, Theos. OpenCourt publishing Company. Chicago and LaSalle, Illinois More Links http://www.weloennig.de/Dollo-1a.pdf http://www.wzw.tum.de/micbio/sigfried-scherer.php http://www.weloennig.de/VavilovLawofVariation.pdf http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_F._Schaefer,_III http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/gkm135v1?ck=nck http://www.ccc.uga.edu/member_page.php?id=8 http://www.ccc.uga.edu/reference/pubs/allpubs.php http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?command=download&id=660 http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&isFellow=true&id=94 Infos about more than 500 scientists and mathematicians against evolution http://www.evolutionnews.org/2006/02/over_500_scientists_proclaim_t.html http://www.dissent fromdarwin.org/ B 11. Nobel Prize Laureate per creation Citations of the scientists here: Albert Einstein Nobel prize for physics in 1921 Max Planck Nobelprize for physics in 1918 Werner Heisenberg Nobelprize for physics in 1932 William D. Phillips Nobelprize for physics in 1997 Richard Feynman Nobelprize for physics in 1965 Hermann Staudinger Nobelprize for chemistry in 1953 Richard Smalley Nobelprize for chemistry in 1996 Arno Penzia's Nobel prize for physics in 1978 Joshua Lederberg Nobelprize for physiology / medicine in 1958 Sir John Eccle Nobelprize for physiology / medicine together with A. Hodkin and A. Huxley in 1963 George Wald Nobelprize for physiology or medicine in 1967 Carlo Rubbia Nobelprize for physics in 1984 Ragnar granite Nobel prize for physiology or medicine together with H. K. Hartline and G. Wood in 1967 AbdusSalam Nobel prize for physics together with S. L. Glashow and S. vineyard in 1979 Arthur L. Schawlow Nobelprize for physics together with N. Bloembergen in 1981 Charles H. Townes Nobelprize for physics together with N. Basow and A. Prokhorov in 1964 Eugene Wigner Nobelprize for physics in 1963 Robert A. Millikan Nobelprize for physics in 1923 William Phillip's Nobel prize for physics in 1997 Karl von Frisch Nobel prize for physiology or medicine in 1973 Sir Ernst Boris Chain Nobelprize for physiology or medicine in 1945 Selman A. Waksman Nobel prize for physiology or medicine in 1952 Hans Spemann Nobelprize for physiology or medicine in 1935 Santiago Ramón y Cajal Nobel prize for Physiology or medicine in 1906 Werner Heisenberg Nobelprize for physics in 1932 Werner Arber Nobelprize for physiology or medicine in 1978 Christian B. Anfinsen Nobelprize for chemistry in 1972 Derek Harold Richard Barton Nobelprize for chemistry together with SUPRA Hassel in 1969 Albert Szent-Gyoergyi of Nagyrapolt Nobel prize for physiology or medicine in 1937 AllanSandage 1991 Crafoord Prize oft he royal Swedish Academy of Sciences in Cosmology," “ It is more difficult to smash a preconceived opinion, as an atom” “ Two things are infinite, the universe and the human stupidity, but with the universe is not quite sure I to me yet.” “ One can never solve problems with the same way of thinking from which they have originated.” “ That and our calculations fail we call chance.” B 10. Prof. Dr. Planck "My men, as the physicist who dedicated his whole life of the sober science, the investigation of the matter I am certainly free of the suspicion to be held for a dream mind. And thus I say after my Erforschungen of the atom this: There is no matter in itself. All matter originates and exists only by a strength which brings the nuclear particles in oscillation and holds together them to the most tiny solar system of the Alls. Because there is, however, neither an intelligent strength nor an everlasting strength in the whole universe - the humanity has not succeeded in inventing the hotly desired Perpetuum mobile ones - we must accept behind this strength a deliberate intelligent mind. This mind is the old reason of all matter. Not the visible, but transient matter is the real, true, real - then the matter would not exist without mind at all - but the invisible, immortal mind is the true! Because there can also not be, however , mind in itself, but every mind to a being belongs, we must accept compelling mind being. Because, however, also mind being not from himself can be same, but must be created, I am not afraid to name also this mysterious creator as him all cultural people of the earth of former millenniums have called: God!” Max Planck Max von Laue Robert Millikan
Prof. Dr. Planck is no exception among scientists per creation Planck itself has pointed on top already to " Kepler, Newton and Leibniz"- about each of these mind dimensions a detailed work would order up to this topic. Bernhard Bavink: " Today physics performs what has always performed the astronomy. She gives itself in them to deepening quite immediate in no manner enforced or erkünstelten, but quite plain and simple, just therefore, however, more magnificent impression of the size and magnificence of God in the creation. This impression speaks quite spontaneously from the works of our very first physicists, like Planck, Einstein, Sommerfeld Eddington, Jeans" In the picture on top middle areto see Einstein and Planck, also Max von Laue and Robert A. Millikan beside Nernst, which can be also called in this connection. See also work of Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker (e.g., THE HISTORY OF THE NATURE) (the author was in in 1946-1957 a manager Max - Planck - institute of physics in Goettingen) and Hans-Peter Dürr ('in 1971-1995 managing manager or deputy Max - Planck - institute of physics and astrophysics, Munich, since 1991MPI for physics, Werner - mountain Heisen - institute') on the subject PHYSICS AND TRANSCENDENCY, in particular also to Werner Heisenberg, but see also Walter Heitler from the circle of the physicists around Max Born. About the nature and the Devine: "Nature can be treated not at all completely academically without incorporating the question after God." Prof. Pascual Jordan. Physicist Other quotations of leading scientists: “Nevertheless, it would have completely operated, one wanted to judge the correctness of a scientific theory par excellence by the number of her followers; since the cultural history teaches to us to know many examples that whole generations of learnt men have held assertions for true and have defended with the contingent of the highest astuteness at which today a layman laughs as wrong” Prof. A. Fleischmann (zoology) Bohr Born Duerr Edington Edison von Weizsaecker Mendel Heisenberg
James Jeans Jordan Jung Nernst Blanck Sommerfeld Wartenberg Edelmann von Uexkuell
There were always among the geneticists of world-wide reputation determined opponents of the theory of evolution Above all these were [of the Austrians Gregor Mendel 1 (genetics),] the Englishmen Galton, Bateson which is Dane Johannsen and some researchers from the Swedish geneticists family Nilsson,book "synthetic kind education" from 1953 a fight controlled with much thorough knowledge against the theory of evolution [1from W.-E.L. supplementally]. Prof. H. Wartenberg (genetics) “In the plan moderation of the physical bodies "God's thoughts" are realised to express it with a word of Goethe; also one has spoken of "creation thought", thus of the embryo box K.E. of bear, the living beings even with special predilection "thoughts of the creation" Prof. W. Troll (botany) ”The Darwinism] is other nothing but the embodiment of the will impulse to get rid of the plan moderation in every manner from the nature . Thus the developing thought has become the holy conviction thousand mark note, however, with a physical research without prejudice nothing at all more close has.” Prof. J. von Uexküll (biolog Why are clearly false theories as dogma defended? Already in the scientific supplement of the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 13 December 1978 states that the review of the literature .... ".... a growing unease at neo-Darwinism clearly. " "His claim, evolution, namely the development of stammesgeschichtliche beings solely as a result of mutation and natural selection to explain, can no longer be accepted uncritically." 1976 there were over 500 scientists all over the world, which not durability the materialistic evolutionary theory identified in the Creation Research Society and the Institute of Creation Research, San Diego (California / USA) have merged. It is here at the Goethe-word recalls: "Everything opinions about things, belongs to the individual and is thus dependent on subjective beliefs, and we know only too delighted that the conviction not by the insight, but from the Will depend. " ( Farbenlehre Polem. Part Section 30 ) Students, pupils, readers, radio listeners and television viewers the impression as if evolution proven a safe scientific theory. The statements of scientists against evolution are suppressed and not to the public. What the students are concerned, the statements of several professors noted: Prof. CP Martin at McGill University (USA) says: "It is not that they are some of these difficulties ... and they know as insignificant or dismiss meaningless, but they have never heard of it and marvel at the fact that it has recognized this doctrine criticised. " American Scientist, January 1953, p. 105 What permanent effects it has when the students a lesson describes the Evolutionist Rostend: "We are convinced of the idea of species conversion completely permeated ... We have learned in school. We repeat mechanically that life through the development emerged was that a kind in the other umwandle. " The Orion Bock of Evolution, p. 95 citations No 480-482 at: Has the person developed or is it created? Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York. Also vest Höfer deals with the phenomenon, one that "... a number of the very best researchers right feeling is that in the present theory to the origin of man anything could not agree", but the other " more incomprehensible is that despite all this theory as secure truth 'in schools and universities for decades and taught wißbegieriger entire generations of young people in a fateful mistake could also be considered later off is difficult, and affects their world view. " The Eigenweg ... a. a. 0, P. 183 GA Kerkert, professor of physiology and biochemistry at the University of Southampton, England, meets the remarkable finding that ... "the student of the evolutionary theory einverleibt, not otherwise behaves as a theology student past. He accept the evolutionary theory as proven out "and plappert like a parrot the views of key representatives of this view." But it was even worse, he asserts in alldem even, "to be different than his predecessors, namely to think scientifically and dogma to abhor. Kerkert, GA: Citation in clear and true ', June 1973, p. 25 DB Hengstenberg discussed the psychological reasons why it is so difficult, the truth to achieve a breakthrough to bring: "The autonomist infiltration of the categories is the modern intellectuals and scientists particularly so in flesh and blood over that he no longer noticed and not think about how to think differently. This is the extreme of evolutionism. The autonomism is also in the Christian habitat. " Evolution and Creation, Munich 1963, p. 176 It must again be recalled that decades ago many of the theologians, especially Weinert, in the Third Reich into the so-called People sponsored three-stage theory (Pithecanthropus [apes human] - Neanderthals - Homo sapiens) were fascinated and convinced, a theory that today all scholars viewed as a bare impossibility. Today, the situation is not much different. Although recognized is that there is a fundamental kinship with the previous types, but by no means be inferred from these, and therefore no Evolutionis mechanism can, at meetings of the Catholic schools the audience a picture that the facts did not meet . Critical questions are - as in a meeting a meeting is called - answered with a shrug. Christian and the World of 5 March 1965 The Catholic theologian Karl Rahner and P. Overhage said, according to Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 20 January 1962 that among Catholic theologians, "the number of those increasingly, as theologians expressly declaring a biological evolutionism with the doctrine of the church represented." The Protestant theologian, the situation is analogous. The teaching Darwin evolutionists have exaggerated. Darwin was not like the materialist science in the following decades until our time, God as creator and the intrinsic effect. He had no Deszendenztheorie designed monistic, but God as creative and organizing spirit is not excluded. This is clear from the last sentence of his famous book "On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection" (1859). Darwin writes: "It is truly a great view that the Creator of all the germ life, which surrounds us, few or only one form has breathed into and that, while our planet the strict laws of gravity following swings in circles, so easy in the beginning of an endless series of the most beautiful and wonderful forms has developed and still developing. " In the following period, the evolutionists every effort, God did not bring into play at all. As had become clear that the research results clearly refute the evolutionism remained only one option, the embarrassment by foreign to conceal. In place of the power of God the Creator were meaningless terms such as "Metakinese “ (Haeckel)," Deviation " (De Baer)," Caenogenese "(Sevetzofi), " neoteny "(Garstang) " Fetalisierung " (Bolk), etc. 'It makes is always good, a Greek word as empty formula to use when dealing with his Latin at the end. In truth, it was - as GG Simpson says - "long abandoned, after the causes of the evolution of search". Tried in vain the Soviet inheritance Pope Trofin Lysenko in the sixties to demonstrate that the Lamarcksche thesis of the inheritance of acquired assets but incorrect. He failed with his theories and was in 1965 as director of the Institute of Genetics discontinued. At his idea that the development of the new socialist man by environmental influences can push, even in Soviet Russia believes no one..” Time magazine. Supplement of the magazine Die Zeit ", dated April 7, 1973, p. 32 Manipulations in favour of evolutionism Despite the lack of foundation of evolutionary theory in scientific work in textbooks in schools and in scientific literature as a secure scientific knowledge gives. Adults and students not knowing how much doubt and growing criticism from the scientific side of evolutionary theory are declared. WH Thomson said in the journal The American Biology Teacher, "... we can evolutionary theory is not scientifically define, let alone prove with scientific accuracy, but we try, to the public by the suppression of criticism and denial of the many difficulties the credibility of the theory. It is also in a democracy not simply to know the truth because the truth has many enemies! In all countries there is a scientific lobbies, a system established and proven methods applied to their hypotheses, they may be still so fragile, to defend as if they were dogma. Doubt on the theory already mean "heresy". Quotes from scientists that show the extent to which the evolutionism not even more than theory, much less secure than scientific knowledge recognized. Portmann, Adolf "Gar some biologist thinks little more that the system is the foundation of all origins theory is that it is safe, what we know, during the development of theories are what we suspect." FAZ, 3 July 1968 and 31 August 1966 Dobzhansky, Theodosius: "... the modern theory differs widely from that of Darwin. Not all biologists are convinced, however, that the theory modeme binding." "Where does this now modern man? Where is he first incurred? These questions are very difficult to answer, we are here so far almost exclusively on assumptions and are still far from a convincing solution." The development ... a. a. 0, p. 341 Gehlen, Arnold "Who as a physicist, a philologist or epistemologist exact methods knows, has no doubts about the highly hypothetical nature of all descent problems of mankind." Man. His nature and his position in the world. Quote Karl Weiss: The spirit is that of life, Regensburg 1947, p. 124 Konrad Lorenz, Nobel Prize winners - stresses that at every stage of development of new living occurs, what the deeper level in no way be inferred. The reverse side of the mirror. Attempt at a natural history of human cognition, Munich 1973, p. 53, 62, 65, 155 and S.223 Westendorf Höfer, Max "The selection can in fact nothing new, they can exceed Mangelhaftes, Lebensunfähiges eradicate. The environment but can only be hidden plants' cause ', so that it looks as if they had the same. The question of where the plants come - and that's the main question at all - remains unanswered. " "It is important that we should not be fooled that everything we accept the Incarnation, uncertain and is hypothetical." "Between the links are not yet never in the field of paleontology, of the man they just had expected, nor from the botany, zoology nor been found." The Eigenweg of human beings, 1948, p. 210 Overhage, Paul "The thicket of kinship relations, through the murky operations of the recombination and characteristic development completed, it is by no scheme or system comes near record and play back." To change the appearance of the first people Freiburg 1959, p. 73 Thorpe, WH "It sets everything on the mutation rates in humans, plants and animals is known, the conclusion suggests the mutation rates were too low, as an organism that by random mutations in a specific direction, forced ', ie against the effect natural selection in an evolutionary line could be managed. This leaves no room for a creative evolution ....... The randomness of variations, to which natural selection acts, is traditionally the biggest bone of contention, even for those who which are inclined to be so eager to acknowledge the theory. " The man in the evolution, Munich 1969, p. 35 Berril, N. J. "There is no direct evidence or no direct evidence that these alleged events or changes have taken place. In a certain sense, this report (on the ladder of organic evolution, d. Vf) a science-fiction." The Origin of Vertebrates, p. 10 Schindewolf, O.H. implementing the following scientists, all in their writings stress that the formation of new types "suddenly and dramatically" in front of him go without that we have for this conversion a reason: de Beer, Beurlen, Garstang, Goldschmidt, Jaeckel, Hauck, Neumayer, Rhumbel, Schindewolf, Sewertzoff, Spath, Veit, Wedekind. Paleontology, development studies and genetics, Berlin 1936, p. 60 Weißermehl, von Huene, Robert Broom, W. Troll, but Aberhalden said :"... palaeontology knew nothing about the origins of types. "We must," as white flour writes, "not to know either with modest, or we must accept that a mental potency, to a German creator behind the whole development is." Citation for Spülbeck: The Christ. .. a. a. 0, p. 137 f. Wood, JG "It is acknowledged that this doctrine (of evolutionism, d. Vf) is not by facts - not even by a single fact - can prove. We have never found that from a kind of another. With our own eyes we do not see that something is going on. In the historical time is not the slightest trace of such a development. " Bible Animals, p. 732 Spülbeck, Otto "The more the books of the descent doctrine viewing, the more one is surprised how much everything through their own spectacles viewed." "The Paleontology and genetics give hints, but does not explain the gap between cause and effect. The discrepancy seems biologically auflösbar not to be." The Christ ... a. a. 0, p. 130 & 136 Habner, Paul "The complete family trees we will never see ahead, the Will of Homo sapiens on this earth fully documented." From the first human is said, Dusseldorf 1969 Woodger, J H. "With hardly any scientific subject-matter are so many contradictions remained as the comments on the origin issues. It is here, including those from recent decades, nearly every record the exact opposite from apparently competent lips quote. This is true even the most basic questions in this science of anti-theses. " Biological prinziples, 1929 Kurth, Gottfried "We still have no clear or even viable references to the room where once the first Voll'menschen from the base layer of the human hominids have herausdifferenziert. Our statement about status and importance of a Fossilfundes should with increasing Material always cautious note. " The (Eu) hominids, in: Collective Heberer: Human descent doctrine, 1964, p. 368 Heberer, Gerhard "On the anatomical roots of this type (before 25 million years, d. Vf) is concrete evidence yet, but probably as much suspect that we will start with an intermediate state between Australopithecus and prähomininen design archanthropiner expected." Screen Beck, Heinrich: You will be like gods. Man in the biological revolution, Dusseldorf 1966, p. 31 Nilsson, Heribert "The theory of development is experimental research is confirmed." Development idea and modern biology, 1941, S.251 Dacqué, Edgar "Non nowworrld any known or urworld - type and shape is designed. That they are in the tree of man as the highest creature collateral. Seitab Everything is developed by the rail at this level." Legacy of the primeval, 1948, p. 193 Schirmbeck Heinrich "Are we with the latest paläoanthropologischen finds the mystery of the Incarnation really come closer? Is the difficulty with the emergence of free human a way out of Triebgebundenheit animalistic existence to explain ... the transition to intellectual-moral behavior, Aware distanced physical posture - features that are given exclusively to the people - and him in a higher category of emporheben seems to us to remain a mystery. " Heberer, Gerhard in Frankfurter Allgemeiner Zeitung, 21 August 1962 Zimmermann, Walter "The crucial process in the phylogeny, the statement:" false ". Evolution. The history of their problems and findings, Freiburg i. B. 1953, p. 547 Beurlen, K. "By no differentiation may exceed the type and spawned a new way." "The theoretical folgernde common form of stem remains construction." "All pedigrees, in the literature on paläobiologischer depth analyses have been published, at the branching points fictional forms, while the fossils are actually present on the side branches." The basics of descent stammes geschichtlichen doctrine, p. 190 & 191 Rostand, Jean "If the problem is solved Evolution ... actually, as the Neodarwinisten say? I am a different opinion, and how many other (!) Also see I am forced, some banal objections to the teaching of Neodarwinismus to collect." "... By mutation arises in organic never build something new, nothing you as a basis for a new body or as a prerequisite for a new feature details. No, I do not have to take me to believe that this' Schnitzer 'inheritance itself with the participation of natural selection and if you for the development of life forms immense periods accepts - for the emergence of a world with its wasteful diversity, where everything down to the smallest sophisticated . For their amazing' adaptation " The Orion Bock of Evolution, p. 79 Romer, AS "The missing link between where we would prefer, and it is very likely that many intermediate links remain missing." Romer, AS in Genetics, Paleontology and Evolution, 1963, p. 114 Dacqué, Edgar ".... Despite extensive material is "straightforward and harmoniously developing stem series nowhere to be found something". "Everything dissolves into types and form their own parties. The conventional tree picture, as it passes through the classic Deszendenz or doctrine provided descent, has never reveal." The fossil creatures, p. 152 Tirala, Lothar Gottlieb "Even today (1969) nor are unbelehrbare Darwinisten and Lamarckisten prepared to Planmäßigkeit in the form and structure, development and individual end of life of animals, the gradual unfolding of low to higher soul life, the greatness of instinct acts to be fit of animal and plant life for a work of chance, the blind meeting of electrons, atoms and molecules and their chains to explain. By contrast, the biology under the leadership of H. Driesch, J. v. Uexküll, J. Reinike, G. Wolff and some other autonomy, the Eigengesetzlichkeit of life, as opposed to physics and chemistry clearly demonstrated. " Mass psychosis in science, Tübingen 1969, p. 8 Thompson d'Arcy, W.: "A study of Darwin's theory descent has not taught us how birds developed from reptiles, mammals from older Vierfüßem, Vierfußer of fish or vertebrate animals from invertebrates. Invertebrates have the same difficulties ... the gap between vertebrates and invertebrates, between the worms and Hohltieren between Hohltieren and protozoa ... is so great that we can not overlook ... " "... You're looking in vain to step stones, the fissures that bridge, because you will never find." On the Growth and Form, 1943, p. 1092 ff Fleischmann, A.: "The practical way to learn about the prehistoric animal kingdom to fathom, is fully exhausted, and the hope for all future destroyed. We get a result just the reverse of what one should expect." The Deszendenztheorie, P. 251 Meyer-Abich, A. means adopted by the evolutionists' transitions' in relation to the lack of intermediate stages everywhere as a "logical impossibility" and then continued: "Each layer or level is a novelty kategorisches, unconnected with the previous level. " It must, says Meyer-Abich further, a "metaphysical process" been effective, "the rational coverage remains inaccessible." Natural philosophy in new ways, 1948, p. 63 ff Fangauf, Werner "struggle for existence, natural selection, conservation of the species, adaptation, forms, inheritance, natural - all abstract! Thinking elements of the human spirit, in the human brain and formed consisting alone in this! Philosophical paper money without biological cover." "As soon as we heard of the enormity of the blind Mutierens freed and knowledge to making targeted arrived, the gene will allow us to witness a category which, as far different from the categories of our mind, this is not understood." The new Herder, Freiburg 1951, p. 1653 Troll, W. ".... a work from the metaphysical sphere "types out the sudden transformation has created.": The virus problem in ontological perspective “. 1951. Citation with W. Zimmermann: Evolution ... aa 0, p. 490 Gray, Sir James "Either we have the only guiding the evolutionary mechanism to accept the natural selection and be prepared to admit that quite a lot of novelty, meaning a completely new type of speculation is associated, or in our innermost thoughts embarrassing to have the natural Selection on the basis of random mutation effect, leave much to chance .... If we organic evolution as a gambling nature, it seems somewhat strange that so many gains they have distributed. " Science Today, p. 29 f. Simpson, George Gaylord: "It has been abandoned, after the cause of evolution. It is now clear that the evolution neither an individual nor a simple cause." The Geography of Evolution, 1965, p. 17, 469 and 470th Quote from: Has the person developed or is it created? Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York. Overhage, Paul "Everything has become through the development, could well also by creating, but not vice versa. Every development is always a little, by creating what already exists and represents a modification or variation of the inherent forces from creations . " To change the appearance of the first people, Freiburg i. B. 1959, p. 73 Illies, Joachim "None of them (the biologists, d. CA) denies the evolution (as such, d. Vf), but they are all doubtful for the answer to the question and doubt factors in the darwinistischen optimism, with flukes of mutation and selection is also why the historical development process to explain. " "It is more insight in the report by the creator God, animal and man to his will made of clay formed than in the idea of a coincidence to us from the dust could grow." Where does the man? German newspaper, 10 November 1972 Meurers, Josef "So such a fascinating idea of an evolution in the whole world, so this fascinating character says nothing about the truth and significance of the concept. Even in the matter, the evolution of the biggest problems dar. "People's Badische Zeitung on April 14, 1967 Haas, John "Even if the assumptions and theories to the Biogenesisforschung forces (in nature, that Vf) appear justified, they are rarely on the degree of probability statements beyond." The major British biologist Woodger, rückhaltloser the facts with clarity, when he writes: "It is sheer dogmatism, if given, things were so zugetragen, as we wish, that it was." Citation for Loren Eiseley: The incredible journey, p. 320 f Kälin, Josef "The biological concept of development contradicts the no-added concept, but puts this advance and gives it a scale, which each added static image appears to be inadequate." "Through the personal will of the people all creation hingeordnet and hinbewegt to that goal, which they expected. This is the human image of the new anthropology, which focuses on the transcendence of his personal lights." FAZ, 16 October 1956 Hengstenberg, HE "As a scientific theory of evolutionism is not reasonable because it makes conditions, in the observable scientific facts are not covered." "He exceeds the statement a conditional link between earlier and later species, from the facts alone are responsible, and it makes a causal link unfounded." Evolution and Creation, Munich 1963, p. 91 Portmann, Adolf "The doctrine of descent of the people in the armed political opinions, in the social struggles of the past decades played an important role. So it was unavoidable that they are often in a survived, outdated form is taught, zeitbedingten the content of the development could solidify teaching, which is now once and for all as a scientific truth should apply. Such rigidity is the worst thing a scientific theory can be done, and the danger is particularly close when it comes to issues of which we in the depth of our human being affected. " From the origin of man, Basel 1965, p. 26 Radl "If even a bad fundamental principle is stated to be true, his own love one thousand explanation of the easiest ways to experience." Citation M. vest in Höfer: The Eigenweg ... a. a. 0, p. 16 N. J Benill: "It may be that it can never prove, but that may not matter, because this applies to material from which one can make dreams." The Origin of Vertebrates von Bertalanffy, Ludwig "society and science were so by the ideas of the mechanism, utilitarianism and the economic concept of free competition pervaded that the selection principle of God's body continued, and the last reality installations." Research and Information, Berlin 1972, p. 81 Sir Hoyle, Fred said in January 1982, that the...” structures of life are so complex that they do not like the evolutionists claim arose by chance could be. Behind the structures is an intelligent plan “. The WORLD, 25 January 1982 Sir Arthur Keit: Quoted: "The evolution is unproven and not to prove. We believe however, because the only alternative to the creation god, and that is unthinkable." Swiss academics and student newspaper No. 51/1976 Shute, Evan - (U.S. biologist) "The argument that the majority was in favour but has never impressed me." "Science is not interested in numerous supporters, but only to the truth." Evan Shute (U.S. biologist): Flaws in the theory of evolution, 1962, p. 229 Kahle, Henning "Despite the widespread recognition of the evolutionary theory in recent years increasingly contradicted. Especially the Neodarwinismus by a growing number of authorities criticized or rejected." "The Neodarwinismus is naturphilosophische rather than a scientific theory, of a fact in no way could it be." Kahle, Henning: Evolution, Bielefeld 1980, p. 159 and 161 A non undisputed representative of Islam. The reader makes himself a picture on his person http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harun_Yahya Adnan Oktar http://www.harunyahya.com/
His books on-line: http://www.harunyahya.com/en.m_book_index.php Scientific studies, proofs: http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/ Video http://www.harunyahya.com/en.m_video_index.php
It will thus not prove existence of a creator, with all the resulting conclusions. The modern father of this current theory, Darwin was never intended to demonstrate the existence of a creator conclusions. In all cultures believe in a creator. It gave him a personal name. In the Bible, he gave himself the name: JHWH or YHVH The exact pronunciation of the Hebrew letters 4 is not known. Some scholars believe that Jehovah or Yahweh right. In other religions is called the Creator: Allah - God - Elohim - Wacan Tanka In modern times, several doctors and natural healers, in almost perfect beings, not to improving an intelligen | ||||||
